Правительство Российской Федерации Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования

1 Finger M.J. The Origins and Evolution of Antidumping Regulation, Working Paper Trade Policy Country Economics Department, the World Bank, 1991, p.3

2 Zanardi M. Antidumping: A Problem in International Trade. // European Journal of Political Economy. 2006. № 22. P.593

3 Mavroidis P.S., Messerlin P.A., Wauters J.M. The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. 2008. P. 3.

4 Reynolds K. From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement. // Review оf International Economics. November 2009. № 17 (5). P. 969

5 WTO Statistics on Antidumping, Antidumping Gateway http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm

6 Vandenbussche H., Zanardi M. The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation. // European Economic Review. 2010. №54. P.761

7 Цит. по: Zanardi M. Antidumping: A Problem in International Trade. // European Journal of Political Economy. 2006. № 22. P. 593

8 Finger M.J. The Origins and Evolution of Antidumping Regulation, Working Paper Trade Policy Country Economics Department, the World Bank, 1991, p.3

9 Lindsey B., Ikenson D. Antidumping 101: The Devilish Details of “Unfair Trade” Law. Trade Policy Analysis. Vol. 20. Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C. 2002. P. 2. http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/tpa-020.pdf

10 Цит.по: Tavares de Araujo J. Legal and Economic Interfaces Between Antidumping and Competition Policy. SICE December 2001.

11 Mavroidis P.S., Messerlin P.A., Wauters J.M. The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. 2008. P.5.

12 Prusa T.J. Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn? // Journal of International Economics. 1992. № 33. P. 2

13 Шепенко Р.А. Антидемпинговый процесс. Источники права (Подготовлен для системы КонсультантПлюс, 2001). Стр 2. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=CJI&n=507

14 Mavroidis P.S., Messerlin P.A., Wauters J.M. The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. 2008. P. 11

15 Ibid, p.12

16 Ibid, p.14

17 Vandenbussche H., Zanardi M. The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation. // European Economic Review. 2010. №54. P.764

18 Durling J., Prusa T. The Trade Effects Associated with an Antidumping Epidemic: The Hot-rolled Steel Market, 1996-2001. // European Journal of Political Economy. 2006. №22. P.676

19 Ibid, p.679

20 Vandenbussche H., Zanardi M. The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation. // European Economic Review. 2010. №54. P.764

21 Ibid, p. 761

22 Ibid

23 Prusa T.J. Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn? // Journal of International Economics. 1992. № 33. P. 2

24 Ibid, p.3

25 Ibid, p.7

26 Bloningen B., Prusa T. The Cost of Antidumping: The Devil is in the Details. //Policy Reform, December 2003. Vol.6(4). P. 236

27 Ibid, p. 239

28 WTO: Technical Information on Antidumping, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_info_e.htm, Assessed May, 2, 2013

29 Zanardi M. Antidumping: A Problem in International Trade. // European Journal of Political Economy. 2006. № 22. P. 595

30 Staiger R., Wolak F. The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopoly. Working Paper №3254, National Bureau of Economic Research, February 1990. P.1

31 Prusa T. The Trade Effects of U.S Antidumping Actions. Working Paper №5440, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 1996. P.3

32 Ibid, p.4

33 Ibid,p.5

34 Moore M.O. An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions. www.home.gwu.edu/~mom/sunsetpred.pdf

35 USITC. Understanding Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, www.usitc.gov/press_room/us_sunset.htm

36 Irwin D.A. Explaining the Rise in U.S. Antidumping Activity. P. 6

www.fordschool.umich.edu/rsie/Conferences/ADSym/Irwin.pdf

37 Section 703(a)(1), 705(b)(1), 735(b)(1), 733(a)(1). 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a)(1).

38 Prusa T. Cumulation and Anti-dumping: A Challenge to Competition. //The World Economy. 1998. Vol.21. Issue 8. P.1022

39 2009 Antidumping Manual, United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration,

Chapter 12. Critical Circumstances

40WTO Statistics on Antidumping, Antidumping Gateway http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm

41 Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, and Ukraine. Investigations Nos. 701-TA-417-421 and 731-TA-953,954,956-959,961, and 962 (Final). Publication 3546. October 2002, U.S. International Trade Commission

42 FY 2012 CDSOA Annual Disbursement Report

43 Ibid.

44 FY 2011 CDSOA Annual Disbursement Report

45 FY 2010 CDSOA Annual Disbursement Report

46 WTO| Dispute Settlement. Index of disputes by agreement cited, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_agreements_index_e.htm?id=A6#selected_agreement

47 Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest. Volume 16. Number 5. US Agrees to Quit Zeroing, Avoids EU and Japan Retaliation, www.ictsd.org/i/news/bridgesweekly/124693

48 Memo on WTO position on “Zeroing”, www.trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/February/tradoc_149065.pdf

49 Bhagwati J., Mavroidis P. The Byrd Amendment is WTO-Illegal: But We Must Kill the Byrd with the Right Stone.//World Trade Review, vol. 3(1), March 2004. P. 219

50 Extension of Japan’s Countermeasures Against the U.S. Byrd Amendment, www.meti.go.jp/English/press/2012/0730_01.html

51 WTO Dispute Settlement Gateway, www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm

52 Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. Article 6.8

53 Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. Article 15

54 ITC calculations based on UNComtrade

55 Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the Republic of Korea; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders https://federalregister.gov/a/E5-4249

56Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the Republic of Korea; Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders https://federalregister.gov/a/2011-5125

57 InfoUSA, US Department of State, The Language of Trade, http://infousa.state.gov/economy/trade/glosssz.html#susliq

58 Пример петиции с доказательством наличия «необходимых условий». Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the Czech Republic, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/1999/9903frn/99-316a.txt