Clause
|
Compliance
|
Comply (Comply/Partial Comply)
|
5,00
|
Is it possible to have at least 8 separate classes of service (with one associated queue per class) per physical ingress interface?
(4 classes for data and 1 class for control)
|
Comply
|
5,01
|
Is it possible to have at least 8 separate classes of service (with one associated queue per class) per physical egress interface?
(4 classes for data and 1 class for control)
|
Comply
|
5,02
|
Is it possible to have at least 8 separate classes of service (with one associated queue per class) per physical egress interface? Please detail is they are common or not for unicast and multicast IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS traffic
|
Comply
|
5,03
|
Is it possible to mix the various methods of marking (L2, L3, and MPLS) on a same physical port?
|
Comply
|
5,04
|
Can marking action be performed in both ingress and egress of a physical port?
|
Comply
|
5,05
|
Does the device support the DiffServ standard as defined in RFC 2474 and RFC 2475 for both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic?
|
Comply
|
5,06
|
Is it possible to mark TOS/DS field on IP packets (IPv4 or IPv6) generated by the routing processor (for routing protocols and management)?
|
Comply
|
5,07
|
Is policing of unicast frames supported?
|
Comply
|
5,08
|
Is policing of Broadcast/multicast frames supported on all interfaces?
|
Comply
|
5,09
|
Can policing be performed at both ingress and egress?
|
Comply
|
5,10
|
Can CIR, EIR/PIR , CBS and MBS parameters be enforced by the policer?
|
Comply
|
5,11
|
Are discarded frames counters (per port, per VLAN, per queue ...) available ?
|
Comply
|
5,12
|
Can policing be disabled?
|
Comply
|
5,13
|
Is shaping capability available?
|
Comply
|
5,14
|
Is per port ingress/egress policing supported?
|
Comply
|
5,15
|
Is per lag ingress/egress policing supported?
|
Comply
|
5,16
|
Is per port ingress/egress shaping supported?
|
Comply
|
5,17
|
Is it possible to have at least 8 separate classes of service (with one associated queue per class) per logical ingress interface? Indicate the maximum number of supported Class of Services per logical interface. Please detail if it is common or not to unicast and multicast IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS traffic
|
Comply
|
5,18
|
Is it possible to have at least 8 separate classes of service (with one associated queue per class) per logical egress interface? Indicate the maximum number of supported Class of Services per logical interface. Please detail if it is common or not to unicast and multicast IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS traffi.
|
Comply
|
5,19
|
Is it possible to classify an IP flow according to DS field?
|
Comply
|
5,20
|
Is it possible to classify an IP flow according to TOS field?
|
Comply
|
5,21
|
Is it possible to apply an ACL filter in order to classify an IP flow?
|
Comply
|
5,22
|
Is it possible to classify simultaneously IPv4 and IPv6 traffics?
|
Comply
|
5,23
|
Is it possible to classify simultaneously IPv4 and IPv6 traffics on different criteria?
|
Comply
|
5,24
|
Can the classification function be activated on both ingress and egress for each logical interface?
|
Comply
|
5,25
|
Is it possible to mix the various methods of marking (L2, L3, and MPLS) on a same line-card?
|
Comply
|
5,26
|
Is it possible to mix the various methods of marking (L2, L3, and MPLS) on a same logical interface?
|
Comply
|
5,27
|
Is it possible to perform L3 marking of local traffic (management flows, routing protocol sent by the router itself, self generated traffic) protocol per protocol?
|
Comply
|
5,28
|
Is it possible to configure a tuneable 802.1p to DSCP mapping table?
|
Comply
|
5,29
|
Is it possible to configure a tuneable MPLS TC (formerly EXP) field to DSCP mapping table?
|
Comply
|
5,30
|
Is it possible to configure a tuneable DSCP to MPLS TC (formerly EXP) field mapping table?
|
Comply
|
5,31
|
Is it possible to configure a tuneable MPLS TC (formerly EXP) field to 802.1p mapping table?
|
Comply
|
5,32
|
Is it possible to configure a tuneable 802.1p to MPLS TC (formerly EXP) field mapping table?
|
Comply
|
5,33
|
Is ingress/egress shaping supported by logical interface?
|
Comply
|
5,34
|
Can shaping be performed simultaneously with policing?
|
Comply
|
5,35
|
Are congestion avoidance mechanisms (like RED, WRED, ...) implemented? Indicate the maximum number of queues (per interface, per slot, …)
|
Comply
|
5,36
|
Is strict priority scheduling algorithm available?
|
Comply
|
5,37
|
Is WRR (Weighted Round Robin) scheduling algorithm available? Indicate the size of input and output buffer memories
|
Comply
|
5,38
|
Is WFQ (Weighted Fair Queuing) algorithm scheduling available?
|
Comply
|
5,39
|
Is ingress/egress hierarchical scheduling available? Detail its implementation
|
Comply
|
5,40
|
Can the scheduling be performed at LAG interface level (n ports on a same board or on different boards)?
|
Comply
|
5,41
|
In case of shared memory, is it possible to limit the size of the queues? Please elaborate (what's the default queue size in byte and packets ? How does it related to interface line speed?...)
|
Comply
|
5,42
|
Is mapping between Class of Services and queues configurable?
|
Comply
|
5,43
|
Does the implementation support specific counter to monitor QoS (queues traffic; discarded traffic, etc)
|
Comply
|
5,44
|
Do these counters allow distinction between “classified/queued”, “scheduled”, and/or “discarded” traffics?
|
Comply
|
5,45
|
Can other QoS information/parameters be retrieved by SNMP?
|
Comply
|
5,46
|
Are other QoS administration mechanism (apart from SNMP) provided?
|
Comply
|
5,47
|
Support a Preference/Precedence/COS indicator that is used internally (e.g., across the switch fabric) that provides intelligent discard if congestion results between interface COS Application points.
|
Comply
|
5,48
|
Support COS/QOS/Traffic Management capabilities applicable per Logical Interface. The logical interface may be associated with a single physical port, or distributed among several ports as in the case of an Aggregated Interface (e.g., LAG group). Discuss the mechanism that enables COS/QOS/Traffic Management capabilities to be supported over Aggregated Interfaces. Include descriptions when the Aggregated Interface is configured in a) Active Standby and B) Active/Active mode of operation.
|
Comply
|
5,49
|
Support Hashing over Links in a LAG bundle based on: ,S/D IP address (if IP payload), S/D MAC Address (If non IP payload), Describe any additional capabilities to load balance traffic flows over links in a LAG bundle.
|
Comply
|
5,50
|
Support traffic policing and filtering. Provide a detailed description of the traffic policing and filtering features of the device.
|
Comply
|
